Have you noticed how the liberal crowd either explicitly or passively think that America is bad. You’ll hear words like “colonialist,” “nationalist,” “populist,” with an undertone of disdain for American pride and history. Instead of a liberal celebrating that America had a civil war that finally abolished slavery, all they will talk about is that slavery existed and it is all the white people’s fault. Make no mistake, liberal ideology wants to destroy America.
This movement fundamentally is an outcrop and strategic mind reality-warping plan given to us by the communists. Its BIGGEST victory in the West was the formation of the European Union, which was a HORRIBLE idea that we see the fallout of every day as European national identities stand up for their heritage—Brexit and Ireland to name a couple—and existence, as they are overrun by foreigners they didn’t invite who want to take their lives and stuff. Sound familiar, Somolians in Minnesota for example… robbing us blind.
That sort of reality gives us men like Xi Jinping, whose parents were killed by the very political ideology that he now leads because they were educated and not willing to be dominated by the state. Xi Jinping is also a glowing example that mind control at the level of internment re-education camps works. People without a moral center will do anything to avoid pain or to be rescued. Even endorse the killing of their own parents. Talk about checking your humanity at the door. It’s barbaric. Can you imagine standing for an ideology that killed your parents? That’s a HARD HEART!
Something we saw Canada attempt to do with Jordan Peterson in the past couple of years, which he flatly refused to participate in and immigrated to America to avoid. The Borg is assimilating while Americans are mostly oblivious.
The EU certainly can be accurately viewed as a response to the rise of the Nazis and the post-WWII self-loathing of the German people and those looking to neuter Europe’s national identities’ ability to rise again. It worked in Germany as we see their country overrun by mostly Russian- and Iranian-backed Syrians without what? Any consultation of the people about whether that should happen or not. It was mandated from on high with no way to stand against it except what? War!
I’m a believer in the trogan horse move being played out in the world by the communist. Causing civil war — Syria, Venezuela and others — that for the first time in History of the world allows people to flee by plane rather than stay and fight for their national identity, is a perfect pawns play for pawn promotion. That is when a pawn in chess gets to the other side and can change into any captured piece they want. It worked like a charm in the EU and Obama and Biden did their best to have it work in America.
So instead of running the world through Nazism, Germany is going to destroy national identity’s ability to form through the destruction of national identity by falling on a guilt-ridden, Nazi-engraved sword that says, “Never Again.” But here is the kicker. Instead of being fascists, they just became godless globalist communists. The same play is at hand in America and its champion is the Democrat Party. Why American liberals, mostly, think that the American flag is a bad thing. That is something new in my lifetime with Democrats and oh how deceived they are.
Make no mistake, if you are in the camp of the anti-nationalist, anti-populist, anti-American ideology, make sure you are ready to live under the thumb of the great leader, Kim Jong Un, like a North Korean, who says what your freedoms are, what you can say, and is only satisfied to be treated like a god because he will kill you, your family, and your extended family for speaking against him. That’s such a great reality to fight for for your children for, liberals… Bravo! (he said with distain and disgust)
Liberals view themselves as the intellectual set, but really what they are is rats filled with hatred that are eating their young to satisfy their own self-loathing. It’s about as pleasing to watch as seeing a rat eat it eats young and is clearly leading us to the next world war.
Who led this charge for the EU? Here is an overview of the players.
The main architects of European integration
Jean Monnet
- Role: Principal strategist behind the European Coal and Steel Community (1951) and later EU structures
- Motivation:
- Prevent another European war by making war materially impossible
- Believed nation-states were the root cause of conflict
- Favored technocratic governance over popular nationalism = communism
- Key idea: “Europe will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity.” Translation: integrate quietly, step by step, beyond what voters would approve outright.
Robert Schuman
- Role: Political face of early integration (Schuman Declaration, 1950)
- Motivation:
- Franco-German reconciliation after WWII
- Christian-democratic belief in supranational moral order
- View on identity:
- Did not openly argue for erasing national culture
- Accepted limits on sovereignty as morally necessary
Konrad Adenauer
- Role: West German Chancellor, early EU supporter
- Motivation:
- Rehabilitate Germany after Nazism
- Anchor Germany inside Europe so nationalism could never dominate again. That didn’t work since Angela Merkel opened Germany’s borders, effectively setting the world toward its next world war.
- Trade-off: National pride subordinated to European legitimacy
Altiero Spinelli
- Role: Ideological hardliner; author of the Ventotene Manifesto (1941)
- Motivation:
- Explicit rejection of nation-states
- Believed nationalism inevitably leads to fascism and war
- Key belief:
- Europe must become a federal state, even against popular resistance
Were they trying to “destroy national identity”?
Short answer:
➡️ Some explicitly wanted to weaken it. Others accepted its erosion as collateral damage. Very few tried to preserve it.
What they actually believed
- National sovereignty = dangerous
- National identity = politically volatile
- Popular democracy = unreliable when emotional or nationalistic
- Elite coordination = safer than mass politics
This produced a system that:
- Transfers power upward (EU Commission, courts, regulators)
- Makes reversal procedurally difficult
- Shields major decisions from direct democratic control
Monnet and Spinelli in particular believed people must be led, not asked.
The modern consequence (not conspiracy — design)
- Borders softened
- Law harmonized
- Culture declared “local,” power centralized
- Dissent reframed as reactionary or dangerous
That’s why critics say:
“The EU didn’t abolish nations — it hollowed them out.”
And defenders reply:
“That hollowing prevents war.”
Both statements can be true.
Bottom line
- The EU was not built to celebrate national identity
- It was built to neutralize it politically
- This was intentional, philosophical, and openly argued by several founders
- Today’s conflict is not Left vs Right — it’s post-national governance vs democratic self-determination
Now you know, and now you can stand against it. Because those promoting it are clueless to what they are doing and for what reason or are they? Mostly, the prolotariate know they hate Donald Trump, and whatever brings him down, they are for. Lambs to the slaughter, and hopefully they won’t kill us all, but they are certainly setting the stage for the ultimate abortion through the killing of their children in the next world war, which America will win, like we always do.